Description: This dataset represents the official boundary of the Wind River Indian Reservation (WRIR) as developed by the Wyoming State Engineer's Office. It is intended to be used by state agencies for any public maps that depict the reservation boundary for any official State purposes and to determine jurisdiction for regulatory agencies. The boundary is defined by separate acts of Congress that restored specific areas of land by legal land descriptions (established by treaty between the United States and the Eastern Shoshone and Bannock Tribes, 15 Stat. 673 (July 3, 1868), and diminished by the Act of December 15, 1874, Ch. 2, 18 Stat. 291, the Act of June 7, 1897, Ch. 3, 30 Stat. 62, and the Act of March 3, 1905, Ch. 1452, 33 Stat. 1016, and as subsequently restored pursuant to Acts of Congress).This dataset represents the summary of all such applicable acts which were then dissolved to create one polygon for visual representation purposes. Baseline information for the data was the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Legacy Geographic Coordinate Data Base (GCDB) which was a collection of geographic information representing the United States Public Land Survey System and other official surveys.
Service Item Id: eb6eb589e0f14d4eb26ac1726e124a2a
Copyright Text: Wyoming State Engineer's Office, Board of Control Division - Technical U.S. Bureau of Land Management - Baseline Legacy GCDB Wyoming Attorney General's Office - Legal Documents
Description: This layer contains 151, 095 point locations of Wyoming well permit locations on file with the Wyoming State Engineer's Office. Priority dates range from December 31, 1867 to April 19th, 2016. It is meant to be used as one resource for well locations within the Wyoming State Engineer's database. New technology provided by ePermit provides more accurate and current information. Users are HIGHLY encouraged to do their own queries and mapping from the tools provided by this internet application (https://seoweb.wyo.gov). Most points are located only to the nearest 40 acre parcel although there are increasing numbers of gps locations. Due to the transition to ePermit some data may be missing. This zipped well shape file can be located at https://sites.google.com/a/wyo.gov/seo/documents-data/maps-and-spatial-data.
Description: This group contains the current public water supply systems for the communities in Wyoming. Not all of the these systems have a updated source water assessments completed.
Color: [0, 92, 230, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: baseline Horizontal Alignment: left Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 6 Font Family: Times New Roman Font Style: italic Font Weight: bold Font Decoration: none
Description: Version 1 - 03.17.08: Sage-Grouse (sg) Core Areas as defined by the Governor's Sage Grouse Implementation Team (SGIT) on 3.17.08 in Lander, WY. Polygons were drawn on a paper map using a sage-grouse breeding density background that was created using Dr. Kevin Doherty's kernel lek density method. At the SGIT meeting, industry, NGOs, and various governmental organizations used pooled knowledge to draw polygons to protect sg breeding habitat. Version 2 - 08.07.08: Everything from version 1 except the redrawing of East Buffalo core area in the BLM Buffalo field office to match up with PLSS lines and better reflect the local conditions identified in an EIS. These changes were approved by the Governor's Office. Version 3 - 06.29.10: These core areas took the versions 2 core area concept further and refined the boundaries based on local conditions and more up-to-date threats to sage-grouse habitat. Each of the eight Local Working Groups (LWGs) met at least once and used core area scale maps (~1:90,000), local knowledge and known seasonal habitat use (winter and brood-rearing) to make recommended edge adjustments to the core area boundaries. The data available included: NAIP 2009 imagery to access the habitat and topography, oil/gas development, mining permit boundaries, permitted wind development, leks, and baseline data (roads, counties, etc.) The LWG's also had sagebrush habitat maps, WGFD Wildlife Observation System data, human footprint data, updated sage-grouse breeding density, and other supplemental datasets to make their decisions. The SGIT reviewed the recommendations by the LWGs and all the available data and finalized the boundary lines. Two connectivity corridors to Montana were also identified by the SGIT in consultation with the Northeast LWG. The final map, version 3 core areas, was presented and approved by the governor on 6/29/10.Version 4 - 07.29.15: Similar process as the version 2 to version 3 revision. The best available science and data was used to refine the core area edges to include new leks, dense population areas, and associated habitats while excluding known conflicts. The data available included: NAIP 2012 imagery to access the habitat and topography, oil/gas development, oil/gas unit boundaries, mining permit boundaries, EIS boundaries, transmission corridors, land ownership, permitted wind development, leks, updated sage-grouse current range, statewide existing disturbance data from the Density Disturbance Calculation Tool (DDCT), baseline data (roads, counties, etc.), sagebrush habitat maps, WGFD Wildlife Observation System data, research locations from Chapter 33 permits issued by WGFD, updated sage-grouse breeding density polygons from Dr. Kevin Doherty, and other supplemental datasets to make their decisions. Each of the 8 LWG's examined the core area boundaries in their area and heard proposals from NGO's, government agencies, private land owners, and industry to modify the version 3 core area boundaries. The LWG recommendations were passed along to the mapping subgroup of the SGIT. The mapping subgroup held public meetings where the original proposals were reviewed and new proposals to modify the core area boundaries were considered. The mapping sub group presented its findings to the SGIT along with the original LWG suggestions. All options and suggestions were weighed by the SGIT and they made formal recommendations to Governor Matt Mead who decided on the final core area version 4 boundaries. In addition to the core areas and connectivity areas, winter concentration areas (separate file) were also delineated. These polygons, located in western Wyoming, delineate a large portion of winter birds not covered by core area designation. Proposals were received to adjust the connectivity boundaries but the SGIT passed recommendations along to the Governor to leave these boundaries unchanged from version 3 to 4. Governor Mead accepted these recommendations.
Service Item Id: eb6eb589e0f14d4eb26ac1726e124a2a
Copyright Text: Wyoming Sage-Grouse Implementation Team, Local Working Groups, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, etc.
Description: These data represent the WGFD edited version of statistically based polygons derived from GPS collar data on mule deer migrating in the Upper Green River Basin. The animals collared are from the Mesa, Ryegrass, and Superior winter ranges from 2003 through 2015. The GPS data were analyzed using the Brownian Bridge Movement Model (BBMM),which produced polygons based on where animals traversed from winter range to summer range (and back) and how much time they spent along the way. The original data were edited to be more manageable on the ground as the WGFD works with land management agencies during land use planning.
Service Item Id: eb6eb589e0f14d4eb26ac1726e124a2a
Copyright Text: Wyoming Game and Fish Department (Karen Rogers, Scott Smith, Bob Lanka, Doug Brimeyer, Dean Clause), Wyoming Migration Initiative (Hall Sawyer), State of Wyoming
Description: These data represent the WGFD-edited version of statistically-based polygons derived from GPS collar data collected from 42 individual mule deer (120 migration sequences) migrating in the Platte Valley mule deer herd unit (MD541). The data were collected between 2011 and 2013. The GPS data were analyzed using the Brownian Bridge Movement Model (BBMM), which produced polygons based on where animals traversed from winter range to summer range (and back) and how much time they spent along the way. The original data were edited to be more manageable on the ground as the WGFD works with land management agencies during land use planning.
Service Item Id: eb6eb589e0f14d4eb26ac1726e124a2a
Copyright Text: Wyoming Game and Fish Department (Kirk Nordyke, Corey Class, Doug Brimeyer), Wyoming Migration Initiative (Hall Sawyer), State of Wyoming.
Description: These data represent the WGFD-edited version of statistically-based polygons derived from GPS collar data collected from 118 mule deer migrating in the Baggs mule deer herd unit (MD427). The animals collared are from the northern portion (Dad/Atlantic Rim; 38 mule deer and 90 migration sequences), and the southern portion (Wild Horse; 80 mule deer and 208 migration sequences) of the herd unit. The data were collected from 2005 through 2016. The GPS data were analyzed using the Brownian Bridge Movement Model (BBMM), which produced polygons based on where animals traversed from winter range to summer range (and back) and how much time they spent along the way. The original data were edited to be more manageable on the ground as the WGFD works with land management agencies during land use planning.
Service Item Id: eb6eb589e0f14d4eb26ac1726e124a2a
Copyright Text: Wyoming Game and Fish Department (Kirk Nordyke, Mark Zornes, Sam Stephens, Doug Brimeyer), Wyoming Migration Initiative (Hall Sawyer), State of Wyoming.